Dating in Your 40s

Dating now

How often should you see someone you're dating in your 40s?

There's no correct number. The pace has to fit both schedules, and closeness should grow over time, not all at once.

A man and a woman in their forties cooking together on a weeknight evening, she in a burgundy sweater.
Illustration. AI-generated image.

There’s no research-backed number. What matters is a pace that fits both calendars and lets closeness build over weeks, not all at once. Your custody schedule may set the rhythm more than anything else.

Is there a right amount of time?

No single number, but time does matter.

Part of the reason there’s no rule is that midlife dating has few set scripts. A study of partners ages 50 to 65 noted that dating and living-apart relationships are common at this stage and come with less clear expectations than marriage.4

Communication researcher Jeffrey Hall studied how long it takes to grow close to someone. He estimated about 50 hours together to move from acquaintance to casual friend, about 90 hours to become friends, and more than 200 hours to become close friends.1 His studies involved adults who had recently moved and first-year college students, and they were about friendship, not dating.1

Still, the point carries over. Closeness takes hours, and hours take weeks. What you do with them counts too: in a study of 49 married couples, those who spent more of their time together talking reported more satisfaction and closeness.3

Can you see each other too much early on?

You can. Writing in Psychology Today, psychologist Seth Meyers argues that seeing a new partner too often early creates an illusion of intimacy before you really know each other.2 A steadier pace, he suggests, gives you a clearer read on who the person is.2

That doesn’t mean rationing time to seem cool. It means leaving enough space to notice how you feel when you’re apart.

What does this look like with kids and a full calendar?

Darius is 44, a high school principal with two kids on alternating weeks. Joanna, 45, is a hospital pharmacist with a teenager at home full time. Six weeks in, they’d found a rhythm almost by accident: every Wednesday night, plus one weekend day on his off weeks.

On his kid weeks, they talked by phone after bedtime. Joanna liked that more than she expected. Darius worried it wasn’t enough, until he asked and found out it was fine with her.

That’s the pattern worth copying. They didn’t guess. They named the schedule out loud.

How do you agree on a pace?

Start with the calendar, not the feelings. Look at what both of you actually have: custody weeks, work travel, a parent who needs a hand on Saturdays.

Then try a few questions:

  • What’s realistic on a normal week? Not the best week, a normal one.
  • What kind of contact do you each like between dates? A call, a few texts, nothing until the next plan.
  • What would make you feel crowded? And what would make you feel forgotten?

If texting rhythm is the sore spot, our guide to what healthy texting looks like in your 40s helps. And when you’re seeing each other often and wondering where it’s headed, here’s how to ask about exclusivity.

What if one of you wants much more time?

It’s a familiar mismatch. One person has the kids most weeks, the other has a quiet apartment and evenings free.

Say what you’d like, once, without making it a test. Then listen to what’s possible on their side. A gap in available time isn’t the same as a gap in interest. A gap that never narrows, and never gets talked about, is worth paying attention to.

Limits of these sources

  • Hall’s hours come from studies of friendship, not romance, and the samples weren’t people in midlife.1
  • The Psychology Today piece is a clinician’s view, not a study.2
  • None of these sources accounts for custody schedules, which shape a lot of dating for parents.
  • The midlife study covered ages 50 to 65, and the time-together study looked at married couples.3 4
  • Darius and Joanna are illustrative characters.

Try it

Which describes your pace right now?

We see each other once every week or two

Slow, maybe by necessity

With alternating custody or travel, that may be the honest maximum. Contact between dates carries more weight here.

Your next step: Agree on one call or long text exchange midweek so the gaps don't feel like silence.

About once or twice a week

A rhythm with room for both lives

This leaves room for both lives and gives the relationship time to build.

Your next step: Check that you're both happy with it, rather than assuming.

Almost every day already

Fast, and fun, and worth a pause

Lots of time early can feel like closeness before you know each other well.

Your next step: Keep one evening a week that's just yours, and notice how you feel about it.

It's uneven, and I'm the one asking

Name it once

When one person wants more time, the pace is a conversation, not a test of interest.

Your next step: Say what you'd like, plainly, and ask what works on their side.

Steal this text

Say it in your own words, or start from these

  • Proposing a rhythm

    I'd love to see you more. With my kids on alternating weeks, Wednesdays and every other weekend are easiest for me. Does something like that work for you?

  • Asking for a slower pace

    I really like where this is going. I want to keep one evening a week to myself so I'm not running on empty. Can we plan around Thursdays?

  • Owning an old habit

    I tend to go all in early and then feel squeezed. I'd rather build this at a pace that lasts. Can we talk about what feels right for both of us?

People who talk about this

Labeled by where their authority comes from. Not a ranking, not an endorsement.

  • Credentialed source

Eli J. Finkel

Research on how modern marriage and long term relationships work, and what partners expect from each other.

Professor of Psychology and of Management and Organizations, Northwestern University; director of the Relationships and Motivation Lab · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source
  • Trending voice

Julie Menanno

How couples get stuck in conflict cycles and how to feel secure with a partner.

Licensed marriage and family therapist (MA, LMFT, LCPC); author of Secure Love · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Justin J. Lehmiller

Research on sex, desire, casual relationships and friends with benefits.

Social psychologist (PhD, Purdue); Senior Research Fellow, The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

  • Credentialed source

Lori Gottlieb

What happens in the therapy room, including breakups, dating choices and the stories people tell about love.

Psychotherapist; author of Maybe You Should Talk to Someone and The Atlantic's Dear Therapist column · credential source

Profiles last checked October 1, 2026

All 10 people we point to →

Further reading

From other publishers we trust. The full list

Sources

  1. Study reveals number of hours it takes to make a friendUniversity of Kansas News (research by Jeffrey Hall), March 6, 2018Used for: Jeffrey Hall's research found it takes roughly 50 hours together to move from acquaintance to casual friend, about 90 hours to become a friend, and more than 200 hours to become a close friend. The studies surveyed 355 adults who had recently moved and 112 first-year college students.
  2. How Frequently Should New Couples See Each Other?Psychology Today (Seth Meyers), November 2017Used for: A psychologist argues that seeing a new partner too often too early can create an illusion of intimacy before people really know each other, and that a steadier pace gives a clearer read.
  3. Time Spent Together in Intimate Relationships: Implications for Relationship FunctioningContemporary Family Therapy (Hogan, Crenshaw, Baucom and Baucom), 2021Used for: In 49 married couples, those who spent more of their time together talking reported greater satisfaction and closeness.
  4. Relationship Quality in Midlife: A Comparison of Dating, Living Apart Together, Cohabitation, and MarriageJournal of Marriage and Family (Brown, Manning and Wu), 2021Used for: Compares partners ages 50 to 65 and notes that unmarried midlife partnerships such as dating and living apart together are common and have less clear norms and expectations.
Up nextYour non-negotiables, before you get serious